Expand description
Vanishing thresholds τ_n and growing memory p_n for Fine–Hwang estimators.
Thresholds are expressed on the studentized scale: lag k survives iff
|stat_k / se_k| > τ_n. On the raw scale of Fine & Hwang this is
η_n = τ_n · se_k ≈ τ_n / sqrt(n).
Which theory justifies which threshold. Hwang’s (1978, Thm 5.3) sufficient
condition p_n / (n η_n²) → 0 translates to τ_n² / p_n → ∞, i.e. the threshold
must grow faster than sqrt(p_n). None of the log n-type thresholds below
satisfies it with p_n = n^0.4 (the ratio p_n/τ_n² grows from 0.9 at n=100 to
5.8 at n=10⁵). Hwang’s condition comes from a Chebyshev bound and is far from
necessary; the sqrt(c log n) and Gumbel-type thresholds are instead justified by
maximal inequalities / extreme-value limits for the vector of long-AR estimates —
see Jirak (2012, Ann. Statist.), who proves a Gumbel limit for
max_{i ≤ d_n} |θ̂_i − θ_i| with d_n = O(n^δ) and derives consistent band-based
order estimators from it.
Enums§
- Memory
- How the growing memory
p_nis chosen; the default was fixed by benchmark.Memory::resolveturns it into a concrete window for a sample size. - Threshold
- Threshold rule on the studentized scale.
Functions§
- polylog_
memory - Poly-logarithmic memory
p_n = ceil(c · log n), clamped to[2, n/4]. This is the window size covered by the uniform law-of-the-iterated-logarithm bounds for sample autocovariances (Hannan & Deistler 1988, Thm 5.3.2; Bauer 2001, Lemma 1), hence a candidate default pending theory work.c = 2gives 9 at n=100, 14 at n=1000, 19 at n=10⁴. - power_
memory - Power-law growing memory
p_n = floor(n^0.4), clamped to[2, n/4]— the Fine–Hwang-style window. Satisfiesp_n²/n → 0(Hwang) but notp_n³/n → 0(Berk 1974 / Lewis–Reinsel 1985 uniform results). It was the package default until the benchmark showed the poly-log window dominating it (notably on seasonal AR, wheren^0.4 < 12untiln ≈ 800); the default is nowpolylog_memory(n, 2.0)viacrate::Statistic::default_memory. Kept as an option and for the benchmark.